Welcome Guest Login or Signup
LIVE CHAT | INSTANT MESSENGER | BOOKMARK US | LANGUAGE:
 


RSS 1.0     RSS 2.0

Total Views: 78 - Total Replies: 3

POSTED BY: pflanagan on 17/07/2007 06:42:58


x





--------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.pflanaganphoto.com - Strive not for perfection but for excellence




POSTED BY: administrator on 17/07/2007 13:01:34



pflanagan wrote:

- Too many people in the "unknown" category makes browsing / searching umembers a hit and miss affair. The job and gender fields need to be mandatory.



Agree - not enough people are filling this in - I think we will need to put a deadline on people updating their profiles.. thoughts...??



pflanagan wrote:


Basic structure of the site is too generic - needs more modelling / photography specific information like type of work sought (casual, fashion, swimwear, etc.) and compensation (pay, tfp/cd). THese also need to be part of the search structure.



The site is aimed at ALL types of photography and not just model type photography - I can certainly add a field but don't want this to be the main thrust of the site...



pflanagan wrote:


 - when browsing, only seing nine members per page is a pain. Allow the user to pick a number, or give alternates like a list layout as an alternative to the grid.



Yet if we had more people would complain about search results being too slow.. it is something I will look at but would also be easily resolved if fields where properly completed to make searching easier... see above!



pflanagan wrote:
.


- Allow the brows list to be sorted by age, location, name, recent update, etc.



It already is in a way... you can list members ONLINE NOW, FEATURED, NEW or RECENTLY UPDATED via the sub menu in the browse section. age can be entered as a search criteria...


 


Thanks for the feedback... please feel free to email me directly with any further suggestions and comments


Cheers


Paul


 





--------------------------------------------------------------
www.folio32.com administrator
Back To Top




POSTED BY: Mooney on 17/07/2007 13:03:27



pflanagan wrote:
when browsing, only seing nine members per page is a pain. Allow the user to pick a number, or give alternates like a list layout as an alternative to the grid.

I agree with this. It could be the same as the gallery browsing where the user can choose how many images he (or she) wants per page (6, 12, or 24). This should suit both high-bandwidth and low-bandwidth users.

I think that the label of the Browse menu item is a bit confusing in the top menu. Browse applies to many of the other menu items in the same menu. I would change it to something like Membership.

M. 

Back To Top




POSTED BY: Mooney on 17/07/2007 19:16:09



pflanagan wrote:
I think Mooney's suggestion of using the same approach as the gallery would make sense. Also, an option of a list format with no thumbnail would actually be faster.

This list format is already implemented in the Gallery also

M. 

Back To Top
02/12/2008



*** folio32.com ***