<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Irish Photographers and Models Community site :: Forums :: Fisheye confusion.com!!</title> 
	<link>http://www.folio32.com/forum/posts/id_710/</link> 
	<description>Forum Posts RSS</description>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Fisheye confusion.com!!]]></title>
		<link>http://www.folio32.com/forum/posts/page_last/id_710</link>
		<description><![CDATA[I’m seriously considering buying a fisheye lens for my Nikon D300. At this stage I have it more or less down to a choice of two – the Nikon 10.5mm and the Sigma 10mm. Both are 2.8, and the Sigma has t]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 10:36:18 +0100</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Fisheye confusion.com!!]]></title>
		<link>http://www.folio32.com/forum/posts/page_last/id_710</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Before my jump to Canon I used to have the 10.5 Nikon. It was a lovely lens, as sharp as I had expected and gave some interesting images. If found that there was a danger of over using it an giving ev]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 10:54:29 +0100</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Fisheye confusion.com!!]]></title>
		<link>http://www.folio32.com/forum/posts/page_last/id_710</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the reply Matt.I want a fisheye for a novelty and fun lens really. Already have mixture of main use lenses - Sigma 10-20 wide angle, Nikon 17-55 standard and Nikon 70-200 2.8. Thanks for th]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 11:13:29 +0100</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Fisheye confusion.com!!]]></title>
		<link>http://www.folio32.com/forum/posts/page_last/id_710</link>
		<description><![CDATA[I have the 12-24 1.4 Nikon with the D300.Super lens and with enough range to give some varietyAlan]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 21:05:56 +0100</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>